<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:nemo='http://www.nemohq.com/ns/nemo/'	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Vogue Still Relevant?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.social-cache.com/2009/01/is-vogue-still-relevant/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.social-cache.com/2009/01/is-vogue-still-relevant</link>
	<description>we deal in uncommon cents.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:44:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nubby</title>
		<link>http://www.social-cache.com/2009/01/is-vogue-still-relevant/comment-page-1#comment-3835</link>
		<dc:creator>Nubby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.social-cache.com/?p=335#comment-3835</guid>
		<description>Ophelia Chong: I agree with word of mouth advertising. The rules have changed and it seems like magazines that were part of the old guard are struggling to keep pace. People can see through the facade of celebrity advertising and want a real, relatable person that they can trust.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ophelia Chong: I agree with word of mouth advertising. The rules have changed and it seems like magazines that were part of the old guard are struggling to keep pace. People can see through the facade of celebrity advertising and want a real, relatable person that they can trust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ophelia Chong</title>
		<link>http://www.social-cache.com/2009/01/is-vogue-still-relevant/comment-page-1#comment-3788</link>
		<dc:creator>Ophelia Chong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.social-cache.com/?p=335#comment-3788</guid>
		<description>To clarify: And it’s the mouth it’s coming out of that will see the product succeed. Pick the right spokesperson for the product,not just a celebrity, but someone with the blog, website, high profile; someone who knows and is known on the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To clarify: And it’s the mouth it’s coming out of that will see the product succeed. Pick the right spokesperson for the product,not just a celebrity, but someone with the blog, website, high profile; someone who knows and is known on the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ophelia Chong</title>
		<link>http://www.social-cache.com/2009/01/is-vogue-still-relevant/comment-page-1#comment-3781</link>
		<dc:creator>Ophelia Chong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 19:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.social-cache.com/?p=335#comment-3781</guid>
		<description>When I got my Jan.09 Vogue in the mail (Hathaway cover) the spine was so thin that the Title Vogue barely fit. Its just not Vogue, it&#039;s all the magazines on the rack. Advertising has been dropping the last 5 years. Conde Nast could see revenue drop 30 percent in the first quarter of 2009. 

What we are entering is a new era of advertising. Its going to get out the way we got it out before print; word of mouth. And it&#039;s the mouth it&#039;s coming out of that will see the product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I got my Jan.09 Vogue in the mail (Hathaway cover) the spine was so thin that the Title Vogue barely fit. Its just not Vogue, it&#8217;s all the magazines on the rack. Advertising has been dropping the last 5 years. Conde Nast could see revenue drop 30 percent in the first quarter of 2009. </p>
<p>What we are entering is a new era of advertising. Its going to get out the way we got it out before print; word of mouth. And it&#8217;s the mouth it&#8217;s coming out of that will see the product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
